All Top Banking

Showing posts with label Internet PIN Debit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet PIN Debit. Show all posts

The Benefits of Debit Cards by Bruce Cundiff via DebitFacts.org

Posted by John B. Frank Thursday, October 30, 2008 0 comments

DebitFacts.org - Ask The Expert
Ask The Expert
Bruce Cundiff
Javelin Strategy & Research


Paying and Accessing Your Money with Debit: A Safe and Convenient Alternative to Cash

The debit card has emerged as a payment method of choice for many American consumers, with 72 percent using debit cards for purchases in the past 12 months, according to Javelin Strategy & Research1. In 2007, there were nearly 31 billion debit transactions at the point of sale, totaling purchase volume of $1.2 trillion2. These statistics highlight consumers’ preference for using debit cards when making purchases at the point of sale, and with good reason. Debit cards provide a safe and efficient method of payment with multiple benefits over more traditional types of payments such as cash and checks.

Recent media coverage of debit card use among consumers has focused largely on the perceived lack of security when using debit cards. This article provides a factual source of information to enable consumers to make informed choices and make the most of their debit cards.

Safe and Secure Access - Reducing Fraud at the Point of Transaction

Debit card fraud is not spiraling out of control, as many in the media would have consumers believe.

Debit card networks, financial institutions that issue debit cards, ATM owners, and merchants that accept debit cards at their points of sale, are constantly making improvements to ensure that debit card transactions are secure, and that they quickly and efficiently remedy any issues that may arise - fraudulent transactions or otherwise. Despite reports to the contrary, fraud rates for debit cards remain relatively low. According to the 2008 Debit Issuer Study, commissioned by the PULSE® ATM/debit network, debit card fraud losses at ATMs were, on average, 2.5 cents per transaction in 2007. The fraud-loss rate was lower at the point of sale, with an average fraud loss of 2.1 cents per transaction when the cardholder used a signature and even lower - only half a cent - when the cardholder used a personal identification number (PIN) to complete the transaction.

Fraud Prevention and Assistance

Should consumers become victims of debit card fraud, however, financial institutions work hard to ensure that the cardholder is made whole again. Limited liability was developed with consumer protection in mind. Unlike with cash, limited liability means that if a consumer’s debit card is lost or stolen, consumers have a chance to get their lost funds back. With stolen cash, once it’s gone, there is little chance of recovering it.

The amount consumers are liable for depends on how quickly the financial institution is informed of the illegal activity. Consumers should check with their individual financial institution for specifics on the level of protection provided.

In most cases, debit card issuers often limit consumer fraud loss exposure to $50. Javelin’s Identity Safety Scorecard, a survey of the security mechanisms the top U.S. financial institutions have in place, indicates that most issuers effectively have a "zero liability" policy. This means that consumers are not responsible for any fraudulent transactions initiated on their accounts3, as long as they report the transactions within a given time frame - usually within 60 days of when the fraudulent transaction was discovered.

Limited liability highlights the benefits of debit over cash. With limited liability for a lost or stolen debit card, consumers have a measure of protection as compared to the "final" nature of lost or stolen cash - once it’s gone, there is little chance of recovering stolen cash.

Debit Cards as a Financial Management Tool

Given the current economic climate, consumers are increasingly seeking assistance from their financial institutions for help with financial management and spending control. Debit cards offer an element of control for consumers in that the money spent in a debit card transaction is drawn from existing funds in their account. Account holders often view debit cards as a vehicle to control their finances and spend responsibly. Since the funds from debit card transactions come out of a bank account or credit union and are not borrowed from a line of credit, it is important to keep track of account balances and how much is being spent to avoid overdrafts and associated fees.

With debit cards, though, keeping track of balances is easier than ever. In addition to available balance information provided on many ATM transaction receipts, online banking allows consumers to check balances and transactions 24/7. Many financial institutions also offer e-mail alerts that can be set up to notify consumers when their balances reach a certain threshold - often defined by the consumers themselves.

There are instances when using a debit card will cause a hold on funds in the account to cover the anticipated amount of the transaction. Financial institutions can place a hold on an account as a means of ensuring payment to the merchant. This "preauthorization" has attracted a significant amount of attention recently as consumers use their debit cards more frequently at gas stations, where holds are common. With gas prices rising dramatically over the past year, merchants are now submitting a preauthorization request to confirm that funds of $50 to $100 are available to cover the cost of a tank of gas.

Financial institutions that issue debit cards are responsible for actually applying the hold, as well as setting the length of the hold, which varies depending on how the debit card is used (PIN or signature transaction). The amount of money in the account available for use during the hold period is reduced by the amount of the hold. To avoid potential overdraft fees that could arise from a hold at the point of sale, consumers should check with their financial institution to determine its policy on the length of debit holds. If a hold lasts longer than an hour for a PIN transaction, or a few days for a signature transaction, ask why.

A Small Price for a Great Convenience

Contrary to some inaccuracies that have been reported, there is rarely a service charge passed on to customers when using debit cards to make purchases. In fact, less than 1 percent of cardholders in the U.S. are charged a fee by their financial institutions for using a PIN-based debit card for purchases.4

While some financial institutions are adding surcharge-free ATM access, most ATM owners charge a fee of $1 to $3 for withdrawing money from an ATM not owned by the account holder’s financial institution. This charge, like the premium paid for valet parking or to drive tollways, is for the convenience of getting cash from an ATM owned by an organization other than the debit cardholder’s financial institution.

To avoid the surcharge fee, consumers can use the cash-back option at available merchants or get cash from their financial institution’s ATMs.

Bruce Cundiff is Director of Payments Research and Consulting with Javelin Strategy & Research - a leading provider of nationally representative, quantitative research focused exclusively on financial services topics.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

PaymentsSource Webinar Available for Public Viewing

Posted by John B. Frank Friday, September 19, 2008 0 comments

Last week I posted "PaymentsSource Webinar Review" about attending a webinar on a new online publication coming out from SourceMedia they call "PaymentsSource."

SourceMedia publishes American Banker, Bank Technology News, ATM & Debit Card news and more.

If you would like to view a replay of the webinar you can click below:

take me to the replay now

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

More on More Card Skimming...

Posted by John B. Frank Wednesday, September 17, 2008 0 comments

Tampa police show a skimming device — the false card slot goes over the original; underneath is a card reader that captures information. A camera is typically hidden on the ATM, often in a pamphlet holder, angled to view the monitor and keypad.

By KEITH MORELLI | The Tampa Tribune

A troubling trend in automated teller machinations has found its way into the Bay area and Tampa police say anyone who uses the convenient roadside bankers can be a potential victim.

Three times over the past two weeks, "skimmers" have been attached to automatic teller machines in the Bay area, devices that steal the numbers off debit and credit cards and record personal identification numbers as they are tapped into the keyboard.

Among the most recent victims: Tampa police Cpl. Mark Altimari, who put his debit card into the Bank of America ATM on the corner of Nebraska and Fowler avenues around lunchtime Sept. 5. He wanted to make a $20 withdrawal.

"I noticed my card wouldn't slide in smoothly," he said at a Monday news conference called to warn banking customers of the latest method of identity theft. "It kind of seemed odd to me." His card went in but only partially came out, he said. He pulled on it, and the whole card reader pulled off the face of the ATM. That's when he knew his card had been scanned by a device that was not an original part of the machine.

He immediately notified the Bank of America and bank security officials told him to check for a camera. He felt behind the trim over the keyboard and found a tiny camera the size of two sticks of gum hidden there. The entire piece of trim itself had been taped into place and looked like it was a part of the ATM. The camera, positioned over a tiny hole in the trim, was aimed at the keyboard to record PIN numbers as they are punched in.

Tampa police Sgt. Becky Bodamer said a similar card scanning device, this one less bulky and barely noticeable, was recovered at Pilot Bank, 4005 S. Dale Mabry Highway, around 4 p.m. Friday.

As of Monday morning, no one had reported missing any money from accounts in either of the banks, Bodamer said, but it was uncertain how many people had used the machines.

Some sophisticated devices are designed to transmit the card number the moment it is being used to criminals nearby, she said. But these devices were not that technologically advanced. They had to be gathered from the ATM and plugged into a computer to retrieve the data, she said. Because they were seized by police, it is assumed the thieves did not have a chance to obtain the information.

The two devices were different enough to lead detectives to think they likely were not put there by the same people, she said. Detectives are in contact with Clearwater investigators, who discovered a similar scanner at a bank there last week.

Clearwater police said that more than 20 people who used that Wachovia ATM over a two-day period last week have complained about money being pilfered from their accounts.

Officers found evidence of an adhesive on the ATM at the bank branch office at 2699 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. They said the scanning device probably was attached to the machine and recorded information about customers' accounts, including personal identification numbers, as the customers used the machines.

In all cases, the devices looked like ordinary card slots, but were not. The false slot holds an additional card reader to capture information. Hidden cameras are one method of capturing a PIN, but another method is a false keyboard, glued onto the face of the ATM directly above the real keyboard. The fake records the PIN number as it is punched in.

If working properly, the machine will give the card back, along with any cash withdrawals, and the user would walk away not knowing their personal banking information had been compromised, Bodamer said.

In many instances, she said, the devices, "can't be detected unless you're a bank official."

Tampa police issued these tips for ATM safety:

  • Use secure ATM machines, inside a bank lobby or inside a store. Offenders can install the scanners quickly, but likely won't go inside a place of business to do it.
  • Cover the keyboard with your free hand when you punch in your PIN. This obstructs the view of any hidden cameras that may be present.
  • Skimming devices may protrude from the face of the ATM. If something looks suspicious or if the keyboard jiggles or the card slot is not quite level, leave and use another ATM and contact the bank to report it.
  • If the machine keeps your card, call the bank immediately.
  • Don't accept help from anyone hanging around the ATM. They may be there to try to observe your PIN number.

Bodamer said the ATM data-thieving trend began in South Florida and is making its way north. Those behind the high-tech identity thievery are likely part of an organized group with knowledge of how such instruments work, she said, and enough cash to invest in the equipment.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Web?

Posted by John B. Frank Thursday, September 11, 2008 0 comments

With the price of fuel hovering at all time highs, many people have started counting the cost of the "shopping expedition" as well as the price of merchandise.

This has created the beginnings of a paradigm shift in the behavioral pattern of consumers and how they shop for goods.

Recent stories raising consumer awareness on the potential of becoming a victim to card cloning, card skimming, Wardriving, etc. etc. only adds to the momentum to forces driving consumers to shop online.

After all, online shopping literally eliminates the fuel factor, having one's own personal swiping device complete with PIN Entry capability virtually eliminates the potential for fraud and e-Commerce pricing usually beats anything found in bricks and mortar locations...and it always will. It simply costs less to provide an outlet of goods online and in the competitve landscape of such a world, those savings are passed on to consumers. In fact, according to an article published today in Red Orbit entitled: Sale of the Century Bargains are one of the biggest allures online retailers have to offer. Here's an excerpt:

"
Part of the internet's popularity is down to its reputation for being the easiest place to bag a bargain. Falling broadband costs, a greater familiarity with e-shopping and increasing online offers mean it looks set to thrive, even against the backdrop of the credit crunch. In fact, online shoppers are buying more regularly than ever before: an average of 16.9 times each per year, an increase of 2.7 purchases each in 2006. This continues to force retailers of every type and size to use the format as part of the way they do business".

Thus, e-Commerce is booming worldwide, not just here in the States.

Therefore it is critical that companies begin to look at how to use the internet to drive sales. Not only should companies utilize the internet for marketing purposes, but they should look at it as a critical sales channel. The numbers speak for themselves. This is not a trend. It is truly a paradigm shift.

Consumers armed with high-speed access and positive online retail experiences are increasingly comfortable shopping online. Metrical analysis of the United States and Europe show trends of increased spending in online retail from last year, and the rate of transition from traditional to online shopping isn't showing signs of slowing down anytime soon. In fact, it's outpacing bricks and mortar, while percentages of online shoppers increase. (see "related stories" below)

e-Commerce is expected to boom for the next 5 years. I say longer. I say paradigm shift.

I say that the web is retail's big bad wolf and it's gonna huff and puff and blow some houses down. Bricks...and...mortar...and... all....oh my.

Kudos to the company that houses the global patent on bringing PIN Debit to the web in a browser environment! It's the most popular and fastest growing payment platform in the bricks and mortar world and has yet to take a foothold in the online payments space. That's about to change however and online retailers will jump at the opportunity to significantly reduce their payment processing costs, risk management, chargebacks and increase the security of the transaction. It's not if, it's when. Period.


Related articles by HomeATM PIN Debit Blog

Transaction Processing Companies Examined - Wall Street Transcript

Posted by John B. Frank Monday, September 8, 2008 0 comments

Transaction Processor Companies Examined in Wall Street Transcript Business Services Report

67 WALL STREET, New York - The Wall Street Transcript has just published its Business Services issue, a report offering a timely review of the sector to serious investors and industry executives. This 55-page feature contains a roundtable forum and industry commentary through in depth interviews with CEOs from 7 firms and 3 analysts.

The full issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online®

Topics covered: Relative valuations, Stock performance year to date, Organic growth, Slowdown in outsourcing services, Outlook for transaction processors, Call centers and customer care, International business outlook, M&A activity, Growth in Eastern Europe, Indian IT vendor stocks, Accounting software space, End markets, China, India, Turnaround situations, Merchant acquirers, Investor interest, Stock picks, Stocks to avoid.

Companies include: Global Payments (GPN); Advent Software (ADVS); SEI Investments (SEIC); Heartland Payments (HPY); Fidelity National Information Services (FIS); MasterCard (MA); Visa (V); Alliance Data Systems (ADS); Yucheng Technologies (YTEC); Fiserv (FISV); Net 1 UEPS (UEPS); Ness Technologies (NSTC); VanceInfo (VIT); Cognizant Technology (CTSH); Sykes (SYKE); Genpact (G); TNS (TNS); Wright Express (WXS); CyberSource (CYBS); Jack Henry (JKHY); S1 (SONE); Robert Half International (RHI); MPS Group (MPS); Heidrick & Struggles (HSII).

In the following brief excerpt from the 55-page report, the analysts discuss the outlook for the sector and for investors.


TWST: Andrew, how has business been relative to what you had expected so far this year?

Mr. Jeffrey: I think it's been pretty strong although somewhat bifurcated relative to my expectations. I think what you've seen is that those companies with exposure to financial institution end markets have put up relatively mixed results, although on balance, I'd say maybe a touch better than what I'd anticipated to date, given the credit carnage in the financial markets. Those companies in payments which are touching the consumer, be that merchant acquiring or the network models, have actually done extremely well - if you think about MasterCard (MA) and Visa (V) and to some extent Global Payments (GPN), largely because they have good pricing power, they are taking share and they are in the sweet spots of their operating leverage curve. So on balance, I'd say things are in line to be a little better than expected.

And from a stock market standpoint, it is a question now of whether investors are willing to pay premium multiples for slowing growth, or whether they are digging around for value. It looks like maybe there is a bit of a rotation starting to take place toward more value oriented names in the space.

TWST: David, same question. How have things been relative to what you anticipated?

Mr. Koning: I'd say in the core processing group, it's interesting. There has been a lot of skepticism, given their end markets are the financial institutions that have struggled quite significantly, but because the systems they provide are so necessary for the banks, they really haven't seen much of an impact at all in spending. In fact, the overall market growth remains roughly in the mid-single digits, maybe 1% or so below where they would have seen growth in a normal environment, but overall, quite similar to a normal environment.

And then I would say in the call center area, we've seen some individual companies put up poor results. But overall, in the end, trends seem to be relatively intact. We've had different problems such as currency pressures or big client exposures hurting some of these companies, but overall demand is reasonably intact. So despite the market skepticism across several of these groups, the results have been reasonably as expected.

TWST: Tom, what's your take on what you've seen so far?

Mr. McCrohan: Results for the most part came in a little better than we were anticipating. I think we were postured pretty conservatively going into the quarter; we had some concerns on some of the merchant acquirers in particular, given the slowdown we've seen on credit, but they've all reported better than expected results.

There was one name that I follow that's really outside of payments called Advent Software (ADVS) that develops and sells portfolio accounting software for investment managers and hedge funds, and that name really had a good quarter for a software company. None of the software companies were saying they were seeing any slowdown, but we are of the opinion that you'll see it when you see it, and so we thought this was going to be a white-knuckle quarter for us, and in the end they had really strong bookings growth.

There's an important distinction within the software market; we don't follow a lot of software companies, this is kind of a one-off name for us. But the distinction is between those software companies that sell to the consumer (they have had some struggles) and those that are selling to institutional clients, such as Advent Software. Bookings growth and trends are staying really healthy for firms selling to institutions and for this company in particular, bookings growth has averaged about 50%.

TWST: Jamie, how have things turned out relative to what you anticipated?

Mr. Friedman: We've noticed in the second quarter that in IT services, stocks performed based on expectations, maybe even more pronounced this quarter than in the past. The Indian IT vendors stocks came under significant pressure. There's a significant deceleration in outsourcing relative to last year. There was some expectation mid-quarter that the companies' growth could recover. But their guidance was just too bearish and the stocks in general really sold off.

Exceptions appear in pockets, like outside of India, in Eastern Europe and China. There's a company called Ness Technologies (NSTC) that now does most of its revenue in Eastern Europe, which appears to me to be the healthiest IT outsourcing market in the world right now. Ness put up 70% year-on-year growth in Eastern Europe and that stock has really responded. The same is true in China, where VanceInfo (VIT) operates.

There does appear to be some disruption now in the third quarter related to the Olympics, particularly in the month of August, but it's a huge end market and the demand trends seem to be healthy. There's a small company in China called Yucheng Technologies (YTEC) that we cover. Their revenue appears to be far in excess of what we had anticipated. So it's been a mixed bag of slower growth in India, good growth in Eastern Europe, and steady growth in China.

TWST: Jamie, what's your thought as we look out? What's going to go on in the space given the economy?

Mr. Friedman: I just want to make sure we harmonize the conversation - business services is a broad space. There are a lot of different industries and companies. It sounds like the direction of the conversation is more toward the transaction processors. I may have been answering in terms of the outsourcing IT service consulting firms.

TWST: We're going to touch on all of them.

Mr. Friedman: Okay, let me start first with the IT outsourcing services. I think it's going to be the same trend. If you can, identify small cap value with good markets, with the thesis being that if you're in a good market it's easier to fix the business than if you're in a challenged market. I continue to like the themes that I am seeing, that I mentioned in the beginning in China and in Eastern Europe. NSTC is one, VanceInfo is another, and YTEC is a third. I may be the only guy here who has ever even heard of those companies, so that may be too obscure a subject! To open it up more generally, I'm still cautious about the overall demand trends domestically both on the corporate and the consumer side, though I do think there will be something of a budget flush if there's any budget left to flush by year-end. A company like Cognizant (CTSH), which is a larger cap vendor, they just came into the year with too high expectations and did have to reduce those, but it's a 15 multiple stock that now seems to have good visibility to a 30% plus growth year. 30% growth in a recession, although it may be much lower than their historic growth, is pretty good for a 15 multiple. So that gives you a mix of names - China, Eastern Europe and the US.

The Wall Street Transcript is a unique service for investors and industry researchers - providing fresh commentary and insight through verbatim interviews with CEOs and research analysts. This 55-page special issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online

The Wall Street Transcript
does not endorse the views of any interviewees nor does it make stock recommendations. For Information on subscribing to The Wall Street Transcript, please call 800/246-7673

HomeATM's PIN Debit Offering Helps SMS Achieve 108% Gain

Posted by John B. Frank Friday, August 15, 2008 0 comments

As Stated by SmartCard Marketing Systems Inc. (PINKSHEETS: SMKG) "Management is pleased to announce Prepaid card loading and payment processing volume continued at expected levels during the 2nd quarter. Card loads and payment processing for the 2nd quarter of 2008 was $458,688 compared to $272,937 in the same quarter of 2008, a 68% gain for the quarter. In the first six months of 2008, SMKG processed $889,583 compared to $317,177 for 2007 representing a 180.4% gain for the first half of the year and attaining the $1 million milestone in July of 2008. Operating losses were cut by 40% for the first half over the first 6 months of 2007, from $182,013 in 2007 to $109,169 in 2008.


We are very pleased with these achievements as it is a difficult segment to establish an online presence in the Money remittance Industry and to continuously grow our base of customers daily."

As the company continues to deliver prepaid card programs and rollout of the Pin Debit HomeATM offering through Velocitymoney.com and Velocitymerchant.com sales, revenues/commissions from transactions continue to grow.

Contact:
Max Barone, CEO  1-866-774-2555
maxbarone@gosmartcard.com

More changes are coming in online payment processing. as more payment alternatives slowly gain traction, with more (can you say HomeATM?) on the way. Soon, online retailers will have another payment-processing option as a big processor plans to split into two.



That company is Chase Paymentech Solutions LLC, which
claims to process two out of three e-commerce purchases made by U.S. consumers.



Chase Paymentech Solutions is a 12-year-old joint venture now owned by First Data Corp., the biggest U.S. payment card processor, and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, one of the country’s biggest banks and card issuers.


After private equity firm KKR (which yesterday announced it is going public) bought First Data, Chase had the option of busting up the joint venture, and announced in May it would do just that.


What it means for the many online retailers that use Chase Paymentech as a processor—including Walmart.com, Zappos.com, Overstock.com and Buy.com—is that the company will split nearly in two, with Chase taking the Chase Paymentech name, 51% of the assets, the Dallas headquarters and most of the employees. Importantly for e-retailers, Chase will retain the Salem, N.H., processing facility that specializes in handling online and catalog transactions.



However, First Data will get a copy of the Salem technology and is expected to launch its own e-commerce processing operation.



Once First Data gets that operation up to speed, expect increased competition for the processing business of online retailers, says payments consultant Steve Mott of BetterBuyDesign. “Many of them will have multi-year contracts, so there will not be a mass exodus right away,” Mott says. “But in time there should be a very vigorous competition for these customers
.




More of the details of the division of contracts and assets will be forthcoming over the next few months, says Mia Shernoff, executive vice president of marketing at Chase Paymentech. Ultimately, she says, retailers will benefit, “because online merchants will get two companies very focused on investing in the business in their own way.”
A First Data e-commerce processor would join an already crowded field in which prices keep going down, especially for larger online retailers. The competition among large processors has driven processing costs for big e-retailers down to under a penny per transaction, says Allen Weinberg of the Glenbrook Partners payments consulting firm.

(Editor's Note: Regardless of lower processing fees due to competition, the Interchange Fees remain much higher than they would be if processed as a "PIN Based" Transaction)
There are certainly plenty of alternatives, but as of now...they're all the same. Providing online retailers with a PIN Debit/Credit option would place HomeATM into a unique position to change the way transactions are done online.



Meanwhile, consumers have several ways to pay other than the familiar pieces of plastic carrying the brands of Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover. Adoption of alternative payments is growing gradually and analysts expect it will pick up—especially if more merchants offer and promote these alternative payment types.



Many consumers continue to shy away from buying online because they fear their personal or payment card information will fall into the wrong hands. (What I call the "Hand It Over Buddy" effect) and why yesterday I posted my article entitled: "Reverse Matriculation: Bringing the POS Device Home" in which I talked about why we should put the swipe/PIN Entry device into the hands of online shoppers so they don't have to enter card information.)



In a survey late last year, 75% of respondents agreed that they did not like giving out their credit card number or personal information online,   including 36% who strongly agreed with that statement.



Zemanta Pixie

Reverse Matriculation: Why Wedgies Are All Good!

Posted by John B. Frank Monday, July 28, 2008 0 comments

Online Banking (the security of which) has been taking a beating over the past couple of weeks. But there's good news too...according to the BBC, Barclay's PIN Sentry Device has made online banking more secure. ( read more on Barclay's PIN Sentry Device and HomeATM's Wedgie) at: HomeATM Has Powerful Potential!



Last Wednesday, I posted a relatively sarcastic article pointing out how blatantly insecure paper checks were (are)...while questioning how it was, that they lasted so long. It got me to thinking... in the future, what will be the perception of the way we process today's online transactions?



So, please allow me a moment in order to set the table for the following blatantly tongue-in-cheek, (yet truly sincere) "insecure scenario:" I will use a brick and mortar example and tie it in with it's analogy to an "online purchase." Ready?



Okay, here we go...
Let's imagine that you enter into a store, and you find something you'd like to purchase. Naturally, you pick the item up (hit select) and walk up to (proceed to) the checkout counter (checkout basket).



Much to your chagrin, when you arrive at the checkout counter...there isn't anyone "physically" there....nor is there a "physical" POS device which you can utilize for self-checkout. (e.g. Something along the lines of NCR's FastLane or Pay at the Pump device whereby you can "swipe" your own card and checkout.) Instead...what you find at this "unmanned" checkout counter, is a pen and a piece of paper. The piece of paper contains three rectangular boxes with instructions.



1. The first instruction tells you to: "write down (enter) your credit/debit card account number in box 1.

2. The second instruction informs you that you'll need to: "write down (enter) your secret 3-digit code on the back of your credit/debit card in the box labeled number 2" (for "enhanced security" (sic) this information is required to be entered, thus potentially hacked, by the card companies)



Furthermore, you are instructed that you CANNOT leave with your goods, as they are to remain with us here at the store. We will, however, ship them to you within 24-72 hours...if all goes well...therefore:




3
. The third instruction informs you that you need to "write down (enter) your name, address, and zipcode" in box number three so we can ship your goods when the time comes. Please
the sheet of paper with your name, address and card information, in the basket and leave the store or continue shopping....



Question: When put it in these terms, would you follow the instructions posed at the checkout counter? You wouldn't do it would you?



Yet, fundamentally this is how every online transaction is currently done. (except of course, ones that are abandoned*) *Note:
Checkout abandonment is a costly problem for Internet Retailers, yet a problem which HATM's wedgie also helps to alleviate.)



This brings me to my point on why HomeATM's "Wedgie" is "all good." Under the aforementioned scenario, it is blatantly clear that, when it comes to online banking or online transactions, "
the card swiping/PIN Entry Device" should be put into the hands of consumers!

Hand It Over Buddy



One's first reaction might be to think that asking the consumer to utilize a personal "card swiping PIN Entry Device is not how checkouts are currently done at brick and mortar locations. There, it is the retailer who is provides the card swiper/ PIN entry device. True, but therein may lie the problem(s). Let me explain...



It was these very same retailers in the "bricks and mortar" world who, "for security purposes" altered their checkout procedures by "shifting" the act of "swiping the card" over to "the consumer."



The reason behind them doing so is because it seems that there were instances whereby some customer's cards were being swiped (by insiders) not only into the retailers POS device, but also into a secondary magnetic card reader. Thus the information contained on the magnetic stripe, was being captured exposing that customers data to potential identity theft/fraud.



Word got out in the press, and in response (and to prevent this from happening), it was decided that the problem could be alleviated if the consumer never "handed it over." but, instead, "swiped the card" themselves. Thus the recent practice of consumers swiping their own cards was born.



So there's nothing behaviorally "new" when it comes to asking a consumer to swipe their card themselves. They've been doing it for a while. In fact, the practice of entering their PIN was existant well before the actual swiping of the card with the use of swivel devices that turned toward the customers in order for them to be able to enter their pin.



Swipe At Home or "Don't Leave Home With It"



With that said there really is no difference between asking a consumer to swipe their own card at home, or swipe it at a retail location. But to be sure, let's analyze:



1. Consumer Swipes their card at the physical "bricks and mortar" store location ...okay, got it...now let's do it the other way...
2. Consumer Swipes their card at "home" where the "virtual store" is located.



Seems the same to me.* *except of course, at home, whereby neither the card nor the Wedgie ever leaves the possession of the consumer, thus shielding said consumer from the potential harm caused by "a rigged" swipe device...



(
See: Cost Plus Alerts Consumers in Southern California Area of Suspected Electronic Funds Transfer Unit (PIN Pad) Tampering at Eight Retail Locations)



It is appearing more and more evident that until someone figures out a way to secure transactions without them, a peripheral card swiping/PIN Entry Device that can be easily connected to a PC, PDA and mobile phone, is an online shoppers "best bet" to protect them against fraud.



Thus...HomeATM Wedgies are "all good"...













Zemanta Pixie

U.K. Online Shopping Up 38% from Last Year

Posted by John B. Frank Friday, July 18, 2008 0 comments


Despite the economic gloom, UK online shopping sales in the first half of 2008 were up 38% - to £26.5 billion - on the same period the previous year.

Out of every £1 spent by British shoppers 17p is now going to online retailers, as consumers switch away from traditional shops in favour of picking and paying at their home computer.

But the index predicts online growth will remain strong this year as a result of tight household budgets, the cost of petrol and "a general desire to shift to more sustainable shopping patterns".

According to IMRG 56% of people think buying online is more environmentally friendly than high street shopping
.

Figures from IMRG, Capgemini and the British Retail Consortium show that the 17 pence in every pound spent by Brits during the period is around half of the amount spent in supermarkets and more than the total spend for all retail sales of clothing and footwear.

IMRG and Capgemini say frugal Brits, hit by the credit crunch are looking online for bargains. E-commerce growth is expected to remain strong throughout 2008, driven by rising fuel costs, falling disposable income and smarter shopping habits.

However, despite faring well compared to the high street, the online channel is not immune to credit crunch woes, with a dip in growth of five per cent for June.

"Whilst online retail is not immune to the credit crunch, it is showing greater resilience than the high street," says Mike Petevinos, head of consulting for retail, Capgemini UK. "Convenience has a sharper edge in a world of soaring fuel prices and the ability to research and make more informed choices in a time of heightened price sensitivity is a key advantage of the online channel."

In the longer term e-commerce will continue to challenge the high street, with IMRG and Capgemini predicting that between 30% and 50% of all retail spending will be online in the next five years.

One important driver for this may be the increasing concern over environmental issues. According to IMRG research, 56% of people believe shopping online is greener in comparison to the high street.

One worrying side-effect of the explosion in popularity of online shopping is a rise in card-not-present (CNP) fraud. According to UK payments association Apacs, CNP fraud rose 37% to £290.5 million during 2007 and now accounts for more than half of all industry losses.

However, the payments association argues that CNP losses have to be seen in context of the huge rise in the number of people shopping online and over the phone. Apacs says CNP fraud losses have risen by 122% between 2001 and 2006 but over the same period the total value of online shopping transactions increased by 358% - from £6.6 billion in 2001 to £30.2 billion in 2006.

Zemanta Pixie



Continental Airlines



SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - 41st Parameter Inc. (
http://www.the41st.com), a leading provider of Internet Fraud Intervention Services and Technology for e-commerce and financial services, today announced that it has been selected by Continental Airlines Inc. (NYSE: CAL) to help detect and prevent Card-Not-Present (CNP) fraud in its online sales channels.



The airline will employ 41st Parameter’s FraudNet(TM) to help it identify legitimate versus suspect website transactions on a global basis, as well as to prevent fraudulent account access, enabling the airline to protect sensitive customer data. This is the latest in a progression of orders that has established 41st Parameter as a key supplier of advanced anti-fraud solutions to the global travel industry.



Important in Continental Airlines’ decision was 41st Parameter’s powerful covert proprietary technology that offers increased visibility and analysis of the airline’s online transactions. The FraudNet solution provides Continental Airlines with all its detection tools on a single workbench, thereby decreasing investigator training times and reducing the volume of manually reviewed transactions. 41st Parameter’s proprietary technology also allows airline investigators to identify interlinked activities and report genuinely fraudulent cases to law enforcement bodies.



"After researching various alternates available for a specialized fraud detection and prevention solution, we found that 41st Parameter has proprietary technologies not available from their competitors," commented Tom Ferazzi, Managing Director, Cash & Investments Treasury, Continental Airlines. "We believe these capabilities will allow us to capture more fraud faster than any of the alternatives we reviewed."



"Card-Not-Present transactions on the Internet have grown significantly in the travel industry over the past few years, and with it the quantity and complexity of fraudulent activities. Our success in this market stems from the breadth and depth of our offering that is enabling companies, such as Continental Airlines, to successfully defend against the fraudsters who are targeting the travel sector," commented Ori Eisen, Founder and Chief Innovation Officer of 41st Parameter.



About Continental Airlines

Continental Airlines is the world’s fifth largest airline. Continental, together with Continental Express and Continental Connection, has more than 2,900 daily departures throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia, serving 144 domestic and 139 international destinations. More than 550 additional points are served via SkyTeam alliance airlines. With more than 45,000 employees, Continental has hubs serving New York, Houston, Cleveland and Guam, and together with Continental Express, carries approximately 69 million passengers per year. Continental consistently earns awards and critical acclaim for both its operation and its corporate culture. For more company information, visit
http://www.continental.com.



About 41st Parameter

41st Parameter is the leader in Internet Fraud Intervention solutions, which detect and prevent online fraud for e-commerce companies and financial institutions. None of 41st Parameter’s solutions require end-user registration, enrollment, downloads or installations. To learn more about 41st Parameter, visit
http://www.the41st.com.



All brands, names, or trademarks mentioned in this document are the propertyof their respective owners.



Contact:Dave Yohe

41st Parameter

Tel: 480.776.5518

Marketing at the 41st dot com



Manuela Whittaker

IBA - PR for 41st Parameter

Tel: +44.1780.721.433

mwhittaker at iba-europe dot com



SOURCE 41st Parameter Inc.




undefined

Zemanta Pixie

Debit Card Growth/Preference is Global

Posted by John B. Frank Monday, June 30, 2008 0 comments



Last Wednesday I blogged about how Debit Dominates China's Bank Card Market accounting for a whopping 93.4 percent of the market total! This week, APACS announced that in the U.K. debit cards continue to be consumers first choice in 2007 accounting for 72% of of plastic card transactions in the U.K. market.

Yesterday, I talked about Canada's shift to Chip and PIN, and a couple of weeks ago, I mentioned that even Malta is jumping on the Chip and PIN bandwagon. Thus, it is becoming empirically evident that debit card growth will continue at breakneck spead, not only here in the U.S., but everywhere across the globe. That's good news for HomeATM and "every organization" involved in our quest to bring PIN Debit to the Internet.

APACS has announced that £354 billion was spent on plastic cards in the UK in 2007 - a 10 percent increase over 2006 - and that spending of debit cards accounted for 62 per cent of total plastic card spend and 72 percent of total plastic card transactions. Debit cards were used to make 4.9 billion purchases in the UK while credit and charge cards were used to make 1.9 billion purchases. Credit card credit outstanding in the UK fell by £1.1 billion during 2007.APACS has announced that £354 billion was spent on plastic cards in the UK in 2007 - a 10 percent increase over 2006 - and that spending of debit cards accounted for 62 per cent of total plastic card spend and 72 percent of total plastic card transactions. Debit cards were used to make 4.9 billion purchases in the UK while credit and charge cards were used to make 1.9 billion purchases. Credit card credit outstanding in the UK fell by £1.1 billion during 2007.

Here's APAC's Press Release:

In the U.K. Debit cards continued to be consumers’ first choice during 2007
2007 plastic card data show:· £354 billion spent on plastic cards in the UK in 2007.
Debit card spend accounted for 62 per cent of total plastic card spend

APACS’ latest publication The Way We Pay 2008: UK Plastic Cards shows that in 2007, for the 7th year running, debit cards continued to dominate consumer card spending, accounting for 62 per cent of the total plastic card spending during the year. UK plastic card payments to UK merchants, retailers and service providers totalled £354 billion in 2007 – over three times the amount of ten years ago (£103 billion in 1997) and a 10 per cent increase on the 2006 figure (£321billion).

Sandra Quinn, director of communications at APACS, said: “Over the past 3 years we’ve seen a pattern emerge: debit cards have increasingly become consumers’ first choice over other options, such as cash, cheques and credit cards. And whilst these figures are for last year, surprisingly despite lots of speculation, all the early indications from our figures so far for this year show that there has been no sudden spike in credit card spending. In fact, credit card spending up until the end of May increased by only 1.2% – below the rate of inflation, and the average value of a credit card purchase in a supermarket has actually fallen by £1 to £34.33(4).

"Interestingly the report also shows that last year debit cards even gained ground in areas where credit cards have traditionally had a firm hold – particularly on the internet. We would, however, continue to remind customers that because of the additional consumer protection benefits credit cards provide, you may find a credit card to be a more sensible choice online.” The £354 billion spent on plastic cards during 2007 equated to 31% of total consumer spending in the UK, with the remaining £771 billion made up of cash, automated payments and cheques.

Debit cards were used to make 4.9 billion purchases in the UK, and by 2017 it is projected that there will be around nine billion debit card payments. Over the last decade debit card spending has increased five fold from £45 billion in 1997. This upward trend is expected to continue, by 2010 personal spending by debit card is expected to overtake personal spending by cash, and by 2017 it’s expected to reach £469 billion.

During 2007 credit and charge cards were used to make 1.9 billion purchases in the UK to a value of £133 billion – an increase of 6% per cent on 2006 figures. This rise in credit card spending did not lead to any increase in borrowing as the amount of credit card credit outstanding fell by £1.1 billion during 2007

For information on how to order a copy of The Way We Pay 2008: UK Plastic Cards and details of other APACS publications available to purchase, please visit
www.apacs.org.uk/publications.html
















Zemanta Pixie

Debit Card Use, Particularly PIN Debit, Rising Sharply

Posted by John B. Frank Tuesday, June 10, 2008 0 comments



According to the latest survey and analysis the use of debit cards for point-of-sale purchases is rising sharply, while cardholders continue to prefer PIN debit over signature debit, according to a study released recently by the Star electronic funds transfer network, a unit of Denver-based First Data Corp. (As always, click the graphic to enlarge to full size)

The study is the latest in a series of annual debit reports the network has sponsored since 2002.

Among consumers surveyed for the study last fall, some 74% reported having used a debit card for a POS transaction within the past 30 days, up from 70% in 2006 and 62% in 2005.

The increase in POS usage was most pronounced among consumers who earn $100,000 or more, with three-quarters reporting usage within the previous 30 days compared with 69% in 2006.

By age, the increase was greatest among those in the 25-to-41 group, where the usage rate rose from 77% to 82%. (See Chart on Right)

At the same time, reasons for not using a debit card for purchases are weakening, according to the survey. Only 48% of respondents said they preferred other means of payment (cash, credit card, or check) in 2007, down sharply from 62% in 2006.

Again, these preferences depend critically on income. Nearly two-thirds of those earning $100,000 or more per year preferred other means, with a strong preference for credit cards. By contrast, just 38% of those earning under $50,000, and 51% of those in the $50,000-to-$100,000 range, had a similar preference for other payment methods.


The study also asked those respondents who had not used their debit cards for POS purchases within the past 30 days what features would encourage them to start using their cards at the cash register.

Scoring highest on this list was fraud protection and assurances of no liability for fraud (70%), followed by ease of use (68%). The lowest scores were registered by avoiding pocket change (34%), attraction of the latest technology (32%), and family-member sharing of cards (26%).

As has been the case since 2002, consumers preferred PIN debit in the latest survey over signature debit, with 54% opting for PIN, 38% for signature. Some 6% said they like both equally or don’t care about the matter. This mirrors the results in 2006 and shows a significant increase for PIN since 2005, when 45% opted for that method of authentication.

The leading reason consumers give for preferring PIN is their perception that PINs offer greater security, with 44% citing this reason. This result has changed little over the years, despite news stories over the past year or so in which criminals have gained access to PINs with rigged devices and used the data along with fake cards at ATMs to loot consumer accounts.

Overall, respondents report making on average 24.6 POS transactions in the previous 30 days, flat with 2006. Of these, 13.6 transactions were performed with PINs and 11 with signatures. While PIN-only users made fewer transactions (12.2) than exclusive signature users (16.9), those who use both methods tended to use PINs more often than signature (23.3 total, with 14.3 using PINs and 9.1 signature-based).

For the latest report, which Star calls its “Consumer Payments Usage and Segmentation Study,” the network sponsored a survey of 3,523 consumers age 18 or older, conducted in a random phone canvass between Oct. 31 and Dec. 2 last year.

You can find the links to First Data/Star's three reports, including the Full Study below:

Zemanta Pixie

Powered by Blogger.

Search This Blog

Our Manufacturing Facility

Learn More About Us

Find out how our patented technology can empower your financial institution.

Our secure two-factor online banking authentication eliminates dangerous passwords and usernames and replicates the same trusted process used to access cash at ATM's. (Insert Bank Issued Card, Enter Bank Issued PIN)

There is an R.O.I. as FI's also earn recurring revenue from each transaction conducted using our PCI 2.0 Certified PIN Entry Device. Our technology also provides a unique real-time P2P "Instant-Transfer" which allows your online banking customer to transfer cash from ANY of their bankcards to ANY other bankcard...with the Swipe of a card.

Help your bank eliminate phishing and your customers avoid identity theft by providing them with the ability to stop typing and start swiping. There is no safer way to conduct financial transactions online than by 3DES DUKPT encrypting the cardholder details, which we do at the mag-head "inside the box/outside the browser."

Total Pageviews

SLIM for PC or SmartPhone

SLIM for PC or SmartPhone
Click to Inquire

Chip and PIN eCommerce and Mobile

Chip and PIN eCommerce and Mobile
Click to Inquire

Kapersky Calls for Mass Adoption of Card Readers

Kapersky Calls for Mass Adoption of Card Readers

Translate This Blog

BobCaps

Search ePayment News (example: NFC)

About Me

My photo
Named one of the best Payment Industry News Blogs 4 Years Running

Feedjit

My Zimbio